![]() ![]() After two-reviewer assessment, five articles were found to match all of the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The systematic review resulted in 865 articles. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot assessment and the Egger-Harbord test. ![]() Sensitivity analysis was performed through single elimination of studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I. Studies were weighted by the inverse of the variance. The pooled results were performed by calculating the effect size based on the Hedges g standardized difference in means or odds ratio. Both PLF and IBF have been advanced as adequate surgical techniques that result in successful fusion and improved clinical outcomes.Ī systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was performed. This study is a meta-analysis assessing the clinical outcomes of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with either a posterolateral fusion (PLF) or interbody fusion (IBF) SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Degenerative spondylolisthesis remains one of the most common reasons for which lumbar fusion is performed in the United States. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |